• The syntax is OK in the sense of, it is an operand, an operator, an operand, so syntactically it's OK.

    这里的语法应该是好的,有个运算对象,一个运算符,另外一个运算对象,因此语法上是没错的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • I just want to remind you, if I wanted to, for example, type in an expression like that, notice the syntactical form, it's an expression, a number, followed by an operand, followed by another expression.

    我想要提醒下大家,如果你想要,例如,输入一个这样的表达式,注意语法形式,这是个表达式,一个数字,后面是一个运算对象,后面是另外一个表达式。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • That is, if I want to combine two things together in a particular way, I need to make sure that I give it the kind of operand it expects.

    也就是,如果我想以一种特定的方式,把两个东西组合到一块,我需要确定,给了运算符它想要的输入。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • I gave it an expression that had an operand in there.

    我写了一个表达式,然后这里又个操作。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • And in Python the expression is, operand, operator, operand, when we're doing simple expressions like this, and if I give it to the interpreter, it gives me back exactly what you'd expect, which is that value. OK?

    在Python中表达式就是,运算对象,操作符,运算对象,当我们处理这样的简单表达式的时候,我把表达式传给处理器,处理器给我返回了我想要的结果,对不对?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定