• So, I infer the existence of atoms based on the fact that doing that allows me to explain things that need explaining.

    所以说我推测原子的存在是基于,该假设使得我能够解释,所需解释的一些现象

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And so we need to appeal to, we need to posit, the existence of, a soul.

    所以我们需要借助他法,我们需要假定灵魂存在

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And so he concluded, "I knew that I was a substance, the whole essence or nature of which is to think, and that for its existence, there is no need of any place nor does it depend on any material thing.

    因此,他总结到,"我知道我是个实体,是思考主体的本质或本性,而这种思考主体的存在,无需任何空间,也不依赖于任何有形实体

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • So if the argument's going to be, "We need to posit the existence of a soul in order to explain creativity," Again, that just seems wrong.

    所以如果这个论证要说,我们必须假定灵魂的存在,才能解释创造力,再一次,这看起来是错误的

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Are there things that need to be explained that we could explain if we posited the existence of a soul, an immaterial object, above and beyond the body?

    有没有这样的事物,只有假定灵魂,这种凌驾于肉体之上的,非物质实体存在,才能对其进行解释

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I've gone through a series of such arguments, and the one that we ended with last time was the suggestion that we need to believe in the existence of a soul in order to explain the fact that we've got free will.

    我已经讲过一系列这样的论证,上次课结束时我提到的一个论证认为,我们只有相信灵魂存在,才能解释我们拥有自由意志这一事实

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • One group of arguments for the existence of a soul says, "We need to posit a soul in order to explain something, whether it's something everyday or something supernatural."

    主张灵魂存在的一方声称,我们必须假设灵魂存在,才能解释一些,司空见惯或是超自然的现象

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定