India was unwilling to meet Moscow's demand for $1.2 billion above an agreed upon price for refurbishment of the warship, which was launched in 1982.

VOA: standard.2009.12.08

This answer that says I just undercut Pepsi, that's true provided that Pepsi hasn't gone above the monopoly price.

比百事定价低点的答案,只有在百事没有高于,垄断价格时才是正确的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Then you make money if the price of the stock rises above, in that case, $11 a share.

如果股票的价格高于十一美元,你就能够盈利

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

especially right now,he says. In Germany, the above market price paid to wind and solar farm owners adds about two to five Euros to the average household's monthly power bill.

VOA: standard.2010.03.23

So the other guy is pricing below costs, the way which I avoid making losses is to set my price above his price.

所以另一家公司定价低于成本,我想要避免损失的方法是,将我的价格设定得比它高

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If he's gone above the monopoly price we need to be a little bit more careful.

如果它高于垄断价格了,我们需要小心点

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

However, then I'll have the whole market, it's as if I'm a monopolist but suddenly I'm pricing above the monopoly price, that can't be right.

但是,占有整个市场,相当于我是个垄断企业,但是我的价格却高于垄断价格,那是不正确的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

You could set your price above his price and then no one will buy.

你可以制定高于对方的价格,就没人会买了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I never want to price above the monopoly price, because I know the monopoly price, when I'm the monopolist, is the most profit I could ever make.

我绝不想高于垄断价格,因为我知道,当我作为垄断企业时,垄断价格能为我带来最大利润

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost, the best response if the other guy is pricing at marginal cost is to price at marginal cost or above.

公司1定价在边际成本,针对对手定价在边际成本的最佳对策,是定价高于或等于边际成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

You set price below his but above or equal to cost.

你定价比他低但是大于或等于成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

You want it, your price, to be at or above cost.

你希望你的价格,等于或大于成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The answer was set your price above his price.

答案是设定你的价格高于它的价格

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So if Pepsi is dumb enough to price above monopoly, sure I will undercut Pepsi but I won't undercut Pepsi by a penny, I'll undercut Pepsi all the way down to the monopoly price and make monopoly profits.

如果百事笨到把价格设的高于垄断价格,我当然要定价比百事低,但不是低一点,我要把价格设得比百事低直至垄断价格,并获取垄断收益

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Price above that.

定价高于边际成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And notice that if Pepsi has priced above the monopoly price, suppose Pepsi has priced this good so high that it's above the monopoly price, then, as the gentleman said, I can capture the whole market by pricing just below Pepsi.

注意如果百事设定的价格高于垄断价格,假设百事把价格定得太高了以至于,高于垄断价格,那么像那位先生说的,我可以用低于百事的价格来占领整个市场

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Well, one thing that goes wrong is that suppose Coke and Pepsi were able to either to write a contract or whatever to sustain joint monopoly output at this high price, this price which is actually producing positive profits in the industry it is going to turn out, therefore the price is going to be above costs.

我来说吧,问题出在这里了,假设可口可乐和百事达成了协议,不管签的是协议还是合同,只要能通过协约维持垄断产出,通过制定高价来达到正的利润就行,这样价格是高于成本的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If P2 is actually above the monopoly price, then what's my best response in that case?

如果P2真的高于垄断价格,我的最佳对策是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选