The government taxes people and it takes some of the money and redistributes it to people in need.
政府向人民征税,并将部分税款,再重新分配给需要的人们。
It could be that there's a dimension about the environment and a dimension about foreign policy, and maybe another dimension about redistributive politics.
它可能是有一个方面是关于环境的,而另一个方面是关于外交政策的,第三个方面也可能是再分配政策
Redistribution is a - if you think about it, says the libertarian is a kind of coercion.
仔细想想,再分配这个概念,按自由主义者的话来说,就是强迫。
You have a progressive tax system that takes more money from the wealthier people and you have a welfare system that looks at individual hardship and pays out.
我们有随富有程度加重税负的,累进税制,还有关注个体并进行再分配支出的,福利制度。
Now, how many agree with that argument, agree with the libertarian argument that redistribution for the sake of trying to help the poor is wrong?
有多少人同意自由主义者的这一驳论,认为为了帮助穷人,进行财富再分配不对?
Is there anyone who thinks that Locke does give grounds for opposing taxation for redistribution?
有人认为洛克确实为反对通过征税进行财富再分配,提供了理论基础吗?
I want to go back to the arguments for and against the redistribution of income.
我想继续回到对收入再分配问题,赞同与否的论辩。
So you're worried that if there isn't some degree of redistribution of some or left at the bottom, there will be no genuine equality of opportunity.
所以你担心,如果没有一定程度的再分配,照顾社会底层,就不会有名副其实的机会均等。
The libertarian's argument against redistribution begins with this fundamental idea that we own ourselves.
自由主义者反对再分配的论断,始于人人自主这一基本理念。
Remember Michael Jordan, Bill Gates, the libertarian objection to taxation for redistribution?
迈克尔·乔丹,比尔·盖茨的例子中,自由主义反对通过征税进行财富再分配?
But let's go back now to the arguments about redistribution.
不过,我们回头来看看关于再分配的争论。
What's wrong with the libertarian case against redistribution?
自由主义者反对再分配怎么不对了?
You'd redistribute in a flash, wouldn't you?
你会马上进行再分配,对吧?
And that's why redistribution is wrong.
正因如此,再分配是错误的。
应用推荐