While there was no significant difference in liver function index between the two groups.
两组肝功能指标等差异无统计学意义。
The result expresses that serum total bilious acid is a kind of intelligent liver function index sign.
结果表明：血清总胆汁酸是一种较灵敏的肝功能指标。
The association of AAA with liver function index suggests the injury by AFB1 to both parenchyma and biliary cells inside liver.
AAA与肝功能指标的相关性提示AFB1对肝脏实质或胆道细胞的损害作用。
Conclusion Clinic symptom and liver function index can be improved after treatment with Ganlixin injection fluid in or drug induced hepatitis sufferers.
结论甘利欣可明显改善药物性肝脏急性或慢性炎症的临床症状和肝功能指标，在改善临床症状和肝功能指标方面优于强力宁。
Conclusion: River clams capsule has auxiliary improvement and repair of abnormal liver function index effects, The goods has broad development prospects.
结论河蚬胶囊具有辅助改善与修复肝功能异常指标的作用效果，该品具有广阔的开发前景。
The objective was to help NAFLD patient reduce their weight, abnormal liver function index and the level of severity for fatty liver, by taking the health promotion program.
主要的目的是希望藉由健康促进的方式，让非酒精性脂肪肝患者能减轻体重、降低异常肝功能指数及 减轻脂肪肝严重程度。
Conclusion the activity of PON1 in serum may be as one of the effective index to assess whether the implant is alive and monitor the patients liver function coordinated with other tests.
结论血清pon1活性可作为判断植入肝脏存活的生化指标之一，协同其他生化指标用来监测肝移植患者的肝脏功能。
The grade difference was analyzed by comparing preoperative liver CT grades of non-tumor area and clinical liver function grade, preoperative and postoperative biochemical index change curve.
将术前非肿瘤区肝实质的肝硬化分级，与术前临床肝功能分级、术前、术后生化指标变化曲线进行对比研究。
Index of virus and liver function were compared.
比较两组病毒学和肝功能指标。
ObjectiveTo understand the index function analysis of abnormal liver function of oral river for liver ill patient.
目的探讨口服河蚬胶囊用于肝病患者肝功能异常指标的作用分析。
Liver function is formed by a series of assay index, among them or a few index are unusual call liver function abnormal.
肝功能由一系列化验指标构成，其中一项或几项指标异常称为肝功能不正常。
Methods Physiological index included blood and urine routine, ESR, liver function, renal function, and immunity items.
方法生理指标包括血尿常规、血沉、肝功能、肾功能、免疫项指标。
Neurological deficit scores, blood clotting index, liver and renal function were examined before and after treatment in both groups.
两组治疗前后均进行神经功能缺损程度评分，凝血指标和肝肾功能检查。
The differences of preoperative and postoperative results of liver function between two groups were not prominent except individual index.
除个别指标外两组间术前、术后肝功能指标的比较差异无显著意义。
Results There were no statistical differences between the two groups on liver function, plasma cytokine and liver fibrosis index before treatment(P>0.05).
结果两组患者治疗前肝功能、血浆细胞因子水平及肝纤维化指标间差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；
The liver function, kidney function, blood fat, insulin release test, serum uric acid and body mass index(BMI)were determined in all cases.
均查肝功，肾功，血脂，胰岛素释放试验，血尿酸和体重指数（BMI）。
Results: there were no remarkable differences in curative effect for two groups. And there were great differences in changes in liver function, immunity index and survival rate.
结果：两组近期疗效无显著差异，而肝功能、免疫指标及生存率的变化差异有显著性意义。
Results: there were no remarkable differences in curative effect for two groups. And there were great differences in changes in liver function, immunity index and survival rate.
结果：两组近期疗效无显著差异，而肝功能、免疫指标及生存率的变化差异有显著性意义。
应用推荐