The basic syntax for an include statement that USES an xpointer attribute is.
使用xpointer属性的include语句的最基本语法是。
While serving the same purpose and sharing almost the same syntax, this statement is quite different between platform and releases.
尽管用途相同，语法也大致相同，但该语句在不同的平台和版本之间存在很大的差异。
When the syntax of an SQL statement is fully known at compile time, the statement is referred to as static SQL.
如果在编译时一个SQL语句的语法是完全已知的，那么这个语句就称为静态 SQL。
This produces the following SQL statement which is structurally complete but with invalid syntax.
这会产生以下sql语句，它在结构上是完整的，但是语法是无效的。
Holding the mouse pointer over a syntax error like this brings up a hover tip describing the problem; in this case, it indicates that it is an incomplete statement requiring a semicolon.
将鼠标指针放在出现语法错误(比如这里的语法错误)的地方，一会将出现一个描述问题的快捷提示；在本例中，它指出语句不完整，还需要一个分号。
The GRANT statement syntax for other database objects is similar and is available in the DB2 UDB documentation.
其他数据库对象的grant语句语法是相似的，请参考db 2UD b文档。
This is in contrast to a dynamic SQL statement, whose syntax is not known until run-time.
反之就是动态sql语句，其语法直到运行时才知道。
If the variable is not defined, the statement is flagged as a syntax error.
如果变量没有定义，则语句被标为有语法错误。
The simplest flow control statement is the if statement, whose basic syntax is demonstrated in the pseudocode shown in Listing 4.
最简单的流控制语句是if 语句，它的基本语法在清单 4中的伪代码中演示了。
The syntax for this statement is very similar between platforms, as follows.
该语句的语法在平台间非常类似，如下所示。
The selection in the Validate statement syntax list determines the parser that is used.
Validatestatement syntax列表的选择项决定了所使用的解析器。
This is indicated in ESQL SET statement syntax using a colon character to separate the two sections of the Qualified Name.
在ESQLset语句语法中，用冒号分隔限定名(Qualified Name)的两部分，以此来表示这一点。
To make this happen, we will use with-syntax which is essentially a "let" statement for macros.
为此，我们将使用with -syntax，这本质上是用于宏的“let”语句。
This is the marker within the transaction that can be rolled back to, if required. The syntax of the statement is.
这是事务中可以在需要时执行回滚的标记。
The syntax of a for statement is similar to a function definition.
for语句的语法跟函数定义有点相似。
Syntax Check: is the statement a valid one? Does it make sense given the SQL grammar documented in the SQL Reference Manual. Does it follow all of the rules for SQL.
语法检查，这条语句是否合理？它是否符合SQL语法文档的相关语法，是不是符合SQL语句的所有规则。
Syntax Check: is the statement a valid one? Does it make sense given the SQL grammar documented in the SQL Reference Manual. Does it follow all of the rules for SQL.
语法检查，这条语句是否合理？它是否符合SQL语法文档的相关语法，是不是符合SQL语句的所有规则。
应用推荐