Business Process Execution semantics are difficult to conceptualize.
业务过程执行语义很难概念化。
This is why process models must be completely separate from any execution semantics.
这就是过程模型必须完全和任何执行语义分离的原因。
It is hindered by its lack of standardized execution semantics and persistence format.
缺乏标准的执行语义和持久化格式阻碍了它。
BPEL 1.0, another standard, defined the execution semantics of a workflow process in a runtime.
BPEL 1.0则是另一个标准，定义了运行期中工作流的执行语义。
For the latter, the BPMN 2.0 execution semantics have been aligned with the BPEL execution semantics.
对于后者，BPMN 2.0执行语义已经跟BPEL执行语义一致了。
BPMN 2.0 fixes this by specifying both the modeling semantics as well as the execution semantics.
BPMN 2.0则通过制定模型语义和执行语义解决了这个问题。
The process language doesn't define exact execution semantics for the different activities like BPEL does.
这种过程语言不会象BPEL那样为不同活动定义明确的执行语义。
Finally, it formalizes the execution semantics of BPMN elements, which helps to interpret BPMN process models unambiguously.
最后，它规范化了BPMN元素的执行语义，这有助于清楚地解释BPMN流程模型。
Glossary entries for defining words include the execution semantics for the new definition in a name execution: section.
定义词的词汇记录包含给新的定义的执行语义是包含在名称执行：节。
That means, a BPMN process can be deployed and executed on different environments provided they support BPMN 2.0 execution semantics.
这意味着，BPMN流程能被部署和执行于支持BPMN2.0执行语义的各种环境中。
For models that show control flow only, both forms can be used interchangeably and the models will preserve their execution semantics.
对于仅显示控制流的模型，这两种形式可以互换，模型将保留其本身的语义。
(Oracle, Manoj Das) BPMN provides a modeling notation targeted at business analysts, specific to process modeling, and one with execution semantics.
Manoj DasBPMN提供了一种面向业务分析师的建模符号，特别是对于流程建模而言，以及一个具有执行语义的模型。
However, as BPMN 2.0 defines sufficient execution semantics, implementations may start executing BPMN 2.0 natively, creating an overlap with BPEL 2.0.
然而，由于BPMN 2.0定义了充分的执行语义，实现可能会从一开始就直接执行BPMN 2.0，造成和BPEL2.0的重叠。
Activiti takes a different tact, choosing instead to embrace BPMN 2.0, which specifies both execution semantics, as well as the visual description of a process.
Activiti采取的是另一种方式，它使用了BPMN 2.0，后者定义了执行语义和可视化的流程描述。
There were and are quite some discussions on whether BPMN should define execution semantics or whether it should only concentrate on the graphical representations.
对于BPMN是否应该定义执行语义和它是否应该只关注图形表示的问题上，以前和现在都有非常多的讨论。
If something needs to be changed in BPMN, it should be removing all execution semantics, it should be designed to let the business analyst express himself or herself.
如果还有什么要对BPMN进行修改的，那就是应该去除所有的执行语义，BPMN应该被设计为让业务分析师能自由的表达。
The task also has a start node, however, this node is optional and does not change the execution semantics of the task, which can only begin execution when the input is available.
该任务也有一个开始节点，不过，这个节点是可选的，不会改变任务的执行语义，这个任务只有在该输入可用的情况下才会开始执行。
For us, the major issues seem to revolve around the execution semantics of a BPMN diagram; for others, it is only a diagram notation and we needn't worry our little heads about execution.
对于我们来说，最大的问题好像是关于BPMN图的执行语义；对其他人来讲，它只是一个图形符号，完全不需要我们操心执行的事儿。
How could a few companies have created a successful market for human-centric processes without the need for an intermediate orchestration language when they added some execution semantics to BPMN?
在一些公司给BPMN增加执行语义的时候连一个中介编制语言都没有，他们怎么可能为以人为中心的过程创建一个成功的市场？
The Command design pattern provides a way to encapsulate behavior in a class with well-known execution semantics. Listing 4 shows the result of applying these two patterns to the code in Listing 3.
公共设计模式提供了利用常规执行语句来在类中封装行为的方法。
For example, until the arrival of languages such as the Business Process Execution language for Web Services (BPEL), BPM notations were missing operational semantics.
例如，在像用于Web服务的业务流程执行语言(Business Process ExecutionLanguagefor Web Services,BPEL)这样的语言出现之前，BPM表示法缺少操作语义。
They often focused on complex mathematical theories (such as the Pi-Calculus) without ever validating if these theory's semantics would actually be enough to support a business process execution.
他们经常关注复杂的数学理论（如Pi-Calculus），从来不去验证这些理论的语义是否真的足够支撑一个业务过程执行。
The semantics associated with metadata range from mere documentation to execution-behavior modification.
与元数据相关的语义范围很广，从纯粹的文档，到执行行为的修改。
The method is complete formalizations, and it has a strong capability of semantics express. The formalizations can be used as a foundation for workflow execution, reasoning, and simulation.
提出的方法是完全形式化的，具有较强的语义表达能力，便于工作流的执行、推理和仿真等。
The method is complete formalizations, and it has a strong capability of semantics express. The formalizations can be used as a foundation for workflow execution, reasoning, and simulation.
提出的方法是完全形式化的，具有较强的语义表达能力，便于工作流的执行、推理和仿真等。
应用推荐