The intentional realist argument made by symbol computationalists is to show that propositional attitudes with semantic properties are causally efficacious.
符号计算主义的意向实在论论证的要点，是表明具有语义性质的命题态度的因果效力。
Understanding argument as a semantic conception or as pragmatic conception is the watershed between informal logic and classical logic.
将论证理解为语义学概念还是语用学(辩证的)概念是非形式逻辑和经典逻辑的分水岭。
This raises problems for the intentional realist argument: How is the semantic property of the propositional attitudes causally relevant to the behaviours of the cognitive system?
这就给符号计算主义的意向实在论论证带来了问题：命题态度的语义性质如何能够对认知系统的行为具有因果相关性?。
The key to the intentional realist argument is to show the causal efficacy of semantic properties.
语义性质的因果效力问题是意向实在论论证的关键所在。
If you want it to take a so-called argument or a parameter, there's a subtle semantic distinction between arguments and parameter, but for all intents and purposes, they're the same thing.
如果你想要你的函数携带参数或，参量，这里有一个微妙的语义差别在，参数和参量之中，但是为了所有的意图，和目的，他们作用是一样的。
Semantic role complexity of subject in ba sentences reflects the inconsistency between the semantic role and the argument of the sentence.
把字句主语语义角色的复杂性反映了动词的语义角色与句式的论元不一致。
It is obvious that there is a disparity between the semantic (argument) structures and their syntactic representations.
非宾格动词的语义(论元)结构与其句法表达方式之间存在明显的不一致。
Each such logical form encodes, in a word-relation-word manner, semantic relationships, particularly argument and adjunct structure, between words in a phrase.
每个这类逻辑形式用“词-关系-词”方式将词组中的词之间的语义关系，具体是内容和修饰成分加以编码。
Each such logical form encodes, in a word-relation-word manner, semantic relationships, particularly argument and adjunct structure, between words in a phrase.
每个这类逻辑形式用“词-关系-词”方式将词组中的词之间的语义关系，具体是内容和修饰成分加以编码。
应用推荐