America spends only 0.17% of GDP on active labour-market policies, such as training and job search, far less than the OECD average.
美国用于激活劳动力市场政策的支出，譬如培训和就业指导等的支出，仅占gdp的0.17%，远低于经合组织的平均水准。
That need not mean more spending (though America does spend a lot less than other rich countries on such "active" labour-market policies).
但这绝不意味着更多的开销(尽管美国的确比其他富裕国家在这种“活跃”的劳动力市场政策上开销得少)。
America's present Labour market policies cannot deal with this.
美国现行的人力资源政策无法解决这一问题。
In contrast, China's family policies emphasize women's participation in the Labour market, but overlook the gender division of household work and childcare at home.
相比之下，中国的家庭政策强调妇女在劳动力市场的参与，但忽视了在家务和育儿上的性别分工。
In contrast, China's family policies emphasize women's participation in the Labour market, but overlook the gender division of household work and childcare at home.
相比之下，中国的家庭政策强调妇女在劳动力市场的参与，但忽视了在家务和育儿上的性别分工。
应用推荐