The court has ruled that police don't violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant.
法院裁定，警察在没有搜查令的情况下搜查被捕者的钱包或皮夹，并不违反第四修正案。
That means for 172 years, the fourth amendment did just fine without excluding evidence.
这意味着172年来，第四修正案不排除证据，也运行得很好。
This Mosaic theory is a new way of thinking about the Fourth Amendment in an age of pervasive tracking technology.
马赛克理论是在如今遍布追踪时代关于第四修订案的一种全新的方式。
Civil libertarians insist that GPS tracking is so invasive that the Fourth Amendment requires it to have a warrant.
公民自由支持者坚持GPS追踪具有攻击性，所以第四修订案要求要有搜查证才可以。
The fourth amendment and case law could not be more clearer the police was required to have a warrant to search that closet.
第四修正案和案例已经明白不过，警察必须持搜查令才能搜查这个柜子。
Meanwhile, Jed Rubenfeld of Yale Law School has tried to reinterpret (.pdf) the Fourth Amendment not in terms of privacy, but in terms of security.
同时，耶鲁法学院的Jed Rubenfeld 也试图从安全感而非隐私的角度重新解释第四修正案。
What evidence may be used in a criminal case, for example, is governed by the protections against unlawful search and seizure established in the Fourth Amendment.
例如，在刑事案审判中能够出示哪些证据，是受到有关保护财产不受非法搜查和没收的《第四条修正案》的制约的。
Procecutor: The fourth amendment does not require warrants. It protects people against unreasonable searches, but it never, by its language, required warrants.
检察官：第四修正案不要求搜查令，它是保护人们免受不合理搜查，但它从文本上从不要求搜查令。
As our sister blog Threat Level has reported, a patchwork of inconsistent recent court rulings has yet to resolve whether geolocation data is protected by the Fourth Amendment.
我们的姐妹博客“威胁等级”(Threat Level)同样报道说，一份对于各种互相矛盾的法院条令的修订案将会裁定地理位置数据是否受到第四修正案(the Fourth Amendment)的保护。
Three legal scholars have written law review articles that wrestle with the problems of applying the Fourth Amendment to cyberspace and to our computer-mediated world in general.
三位法律学者写了一些法律评论文章试图解决将第四修正案应用到网络空间和整个以电脑为媒介的世界中所出现的问题。
The language only requires reasonableness, and nowhere, nowhere in the fourth amendment ever say the evidence obtained absent of a warrant, even absent of reasonableness be excluded.
但文本上只要求合理性，第四修正案没有哪处曾说没有搜查令，甚至没有合理性而获得的证据必须被排除。
And what about abolishing the Transportation Security Administration, which has done so much to harass those who travel by commercial air and to violate their Fourth Amendment rights?
废除美国运输安全局怎么样？该部门侵扰了许多坐商务机旅行的人们，并违反了第四修正案中规定的这些人的权利。
The judge: I agree with Ms Gemble there is nothing in the language of the fourth amendment that requires warrants. Nor is there anything that says illegally obtained evidence should be excluded.
法官：我同意Gemble女士所说的第四修正案文本并不要求搜查令，也不存在其它任何规定表明非法获得的证据必须被排除。
The judge: I agree with Ms Gemble there is nothing in the language of the fourth amendment that requires warrants. Nor is there anything that says illegally obtained evidence should be excluded.
法官：我同意Gemble女士所说的第四修正案文本并不要求搜查令，也不存在其它任何规定表明非法获得的证据必须被排除。
应用推荐