哪一个是最佳选择：IVF或输卵管复通术？
显然在IVF和输卵管复通术间选择其一是很困难的。
Obviously the decision between IVF and tubal reversal is difficult.
这种情况下，输卵管复通术常常成为性价比最高的选择。
In this case, tubal reversal often becomes the more cost-effective option.
如果想要多个小孩并且女方还年轻，输卵管复通术也许更好一点。
If multiple children are desired and the woman is young, tubal reversal is perhaps a better choice.
目的：探讨用显微外科技术进行输卵管复通术的效果及影响因素。
Objective: To determine the consequence and influence factors of reversal of fallopian tube sterilization using microsurgical techniques.
在某些地方，输卵管复通术的花费要超出IVF，这直接影响到手术的有效性。
In some areas, the cost of tubal reversal exceeds IVF which then directly affects the procedure's availability.
根据几项不同的研究报告，显微输卵管复通术的活产率约在55 ~ 81%范围内。
Live birth rates following microsurgical tubal reversal have been reported to range between 55-81% in several reported series.
位于成都的四川生殖专科医院已经为灾区的父母施行了30多例输卵管复通术和输精管重建术。
The Sichuan Reproductive Faculty Hospital in Chengdu has performed more than 30 procedures to reverse tubal ligations and vasectomies for quake parents.
超过了42 ~ 43岁，不管输卵管复通术还是IVF其成功率都相当低且两者相仿：大多数报道是低于1 ~ 3%。
Beyond age 42-43, the likelihood of success with either tubal reversal or IVF is extremely low and approximately equal: less than 1-3% in most reports.
对采用IVF或是输卵管复通术作出判断是相当复杂的，受到许多因素如年龄、费用以及可能存在的其他不孕因素的影响。
The decision between IVF and tubal reversal is highly complex and profoundly affected by the factors of age, cost and time as well as the presence of other potential infertility problems.
另外一些地区，进行输卵管复通术的外科医生已经建立了高人流量的门诊外科诊所，这使得手术费用可以维持在相对较低的水平。
In other areas, surgeons performing tubal reversals have set up high-volume outpatient surgery clinics which allow costs to be kept to a relative minimum.
在2007年发表的一项比利时回顾研究中，IVF和输卵管复通术的受孕率之间在统计学上没有显著差异，直到按女性年龄进行评估。
In a retrospective Belgian study published in 2007, the difference in pregnancy rates between IVF and tubal reversal were statistically insignificant until they were examined by age of the woman.
在2007年发表的一项比利时回顾研究中，IVF和输卵管复通术的受孕率之间在统计学上没有显著差异，直到按女性年龄进行评估。
In a retrospective Belgian study published in 2007, the difference in pregnancy rates between IVF and tubal reversal were statistically insignificant until they were examined by age of the woman.
应用推荐