《芬尼根守灵夜》乃一本“混沌之书”。
乔学可大体上从一般性批评、《尤利西斯》之前的批评、《尤利西斯》批评、《芬尼根守灵夜》批评作总体考察。
This essay tries to get a panoramic view from the general criticism, criticism before Ulysses, Ulyssescriticism and Finnegans Wakecriticism.
詹姆斯·乔伊斯(2)写的《尤利西斯》和《芬尼根守灵记》，如同互相撞击，前后参映的思想网络，每次阅读都会有变幻不定的感觉。
James Joyce wrote Ulysses and Finnegan's Wake as a network of ideas colliding, cross-referencing, and shifting upon each reading.
比如说，我们在读《芬尼根的守灵》时，我们完全无法领会。
For example, we're reading Finnegan's Wake. We haven't got a clue.
在创作的早期，乔伊斯遵循的是中立、冷漠的现代叙述原则，但到了《芬尼根的守灵》，乔伊斯使叙述成了叙述者的快乐言说。
Joyce obeyed the modern narrative principle of neutrality and detachment during his early period of writing. However in Finnegans Wake, Joyce created a loquacious narrator.
在创作的早期，乔伊斯遵循的是中立、冷漠的现代叙述原则，但到了《芬尼根的守灵》，乔伊斯使叙述成了叙述者的快乐言说。
Joyce obeyed the modern narrative principle of neutrality and detachment during his early period of writing. However in Finnegans Wake, Joyce created a loquacious narrator.
应用推荐