采用性状鉴定、显微鉴定、薄层色谱和紫外光谱法进行比较研究。
The comparative study was conducted by trait identification, microscopic identification, thin-layer chromatography and ultraviolet spectroscopy.
采用示差光谱法对玉米叶片残体腐解过程进行了研究，并与常规谱进行了比较。
The decomposing process of corn leaf residues(CLR)was studied by FTIR differential analysis, and the differential spectra were compared with normal spectra.
本文采用红外光谱法对经不同剂量核辐照的三七粉进行了对比研究，比较了它们红外光谱的异同。
This paper is studying Panax Notoginseng powder irradiated by different doses using Fourier Transform Infrared(FTIR) Spectrocopy, contrasting the difference of their Infrared Spectrocopy.
对原子吸收法与等离子光谱法在水质检测中的优缺点进行比较，对于如何根据具体情况选择适当的分析方法进行了探讨。
This paper introduced research that how to choice suitable analysis method according to actual situation after compared the advantage and defect of water quality determined with AAS and ICP.
本文比较研究了导数光谱法和常规光谱法的信背比、传统检出限和真实检出限。
The present paper deals with the signal-to-background ratio and detection limit of derivative spectrometry.
本论文分别采用紫外吸收光谱法和高效液相色谱法测定阿司匹林的含量，并对两种方法进行比较。
In this article, we use two methods to determine the content of Aspirin. The two methods are UV spectrophotometry and HPLC.
同时比较了两种方法的样品测试值，证实火焰原子吸收光谱法测试不锈钢食具中的铅、铬、镍切实可行。
Compared the sample test result of two kinds of methods, It proves the meth - od that flame atomic absorption spectrometer determinates Pb, Cr, Ni in stainless steel food container is feasible.
方法分别采用分光光度法和电感耦合等离子发射光谱法测定样品中的磷酸盐，比较两种方法的可行性。
METHODS the content of phosphate were determined by the inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and Spectrophotography, and the comparing their feasibility.
方法采用高效液相法与紫外吸收光谱法测定提取液中黄芪总苷、 淫羊藿苷含量，通过计算转移率和得膏率，比较两种澄清工艺。
Methods Astragaloside and icariin contents in extracting solution were detected with HPLC and UV-spectrum methods. Metastasis rates and yield were calculated and two techniques were compared.
与紫外光谱法作比较，该实验方法具有可行性。
In comparison with the ultraviolet spectrometry, the method mentioned above is feasible.
该方法与等离子体发射光谱法、有机相富集火焰原子吸收光谱法比较结果无显著差别，加标回收率为96 %— 1 0 7%。
The recoveries are in the range of 96% to 107%. There are not significant differences between the results of this method and those of the organic phase-FAAS and ICP-IES.
该方法与等离子体发射光谱法、有机相富集火焰原子吸收光谱法比较结果无显著差别，加标回收率为96 %— 1 0 7%。
The recoveries are in the range of 96% to 107%. There are not significant differences between the results of this method and those of the organic phase-FAAS and ICP-IES.
应用推荐