因为两个错误，并不能变成正确的。
你会在第二个方法处得到一个编译错误，因为这两个方法在类型消除后拥有一样的签名。
You'll get a compilation error on the second method because the two methods will have an identical signature after type erasure.
但是，这次您不会收到指明不能放弃两个表的错误消息，因为您已经创建了它们（如 清单2 所示）。
This time, however, you don't get error messages saying the two tables can't be dropped, because you already created them (as shown in Listing 2).
语音匹配算法不能用它的替换来匹配这种拼写错误，因为两个单词听起来是不同的。
A phonetic matching algorithm cannot match this type of misspelling with its replacement, since the two words sound different.
这个问题不像签名问题那么严重，这是因为实践中很少有机会使用两个不同的算法套件，但它依旧是一个错误。
This is not as significant a problem as the signing issue, in that there's little reason to use two different algorithm suites in practice, but it's still an error.
毫无疑问，总会有人因为使用这类软件而与错误的人约会，惹上麻烦——就像两个星期前《特殊受害人》所讲到的一样。
Undoubtedly, it's just a matter of time before someone using one of these apps gets into trouble, meeting up with the wrong person-just as we showed on SVU two weeks ago.
我们常常不经仔细推理就给出错误的答案，这可能是因为大脑使用两个不同的系统来处理信息（见New Scientist30August 2008p34）。
Without careful reasoning we often get them wrong, probably because our brains use two different systems to process information (see New Scientist, 30 August 2008, p 34).
因为拼写检查是不会查出”from”和”form”这两个词的错误的。
Spell check wouldn’t pick up on the difference between “from” and “form” for example.
这个错误信息刚开始看上去还挺不好理解，因为括号里面确实是只有两个参数。不过实际上主语也会把自己当做一个参数，所以总共实际上是有三个参数了。
The error message is initially confusing, because there are only two arguments in parentheses. But the subject is also considered an argument, so all together that's three.
我们看到它们两个都是大写的，因为我们犯了一个新的错误。
We're going to see them both capitalized because I've made a newbie mistake here.
如果你把它作为一个答案我就接受了它，因为它指出了一个错误在角和其他两个答案不符合当前的体系结构。
If you had placed it as an answer I would have accepted it, because it points to a bug in Angular and the other two answers do not fit with the current architecture.
他们不同意保存错误，因为两个完全没有牙齿破裂的物种证明了断裂不是由坑内磨损引起。
They rejected preservational bias because a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits.
两个主题不能有同样的详细信息列在它们的评论标题上，因为这会引起主题选择对话的错误。
No two Themes are allowed to have the same details listed in their comment headers, as this will lead to problems in the Theme selection dialog.
两个主题不能有同样的详细信息列在它们的评论标题上，因为这会引起主题选择对话的错误。
No two Themes are allowed to have the same details listed in their comment headers, as this will lead to problems in the Theme selection dialog.
应用推荐