本文试图简别自亚理斯多德以来的悲剧人物观。
This essay has tried to analyze the notions of tragic characters since Aristotle.
关于此的讨论可追溯到柏拉图和亚理斯多德的著作。
Discussions of this go back to the works of Plato and Aristotle.
亚理斯多德对第四种情况的高度精练的表达可以用以下的例子详细描述。
Aristotle's highly condensed presentation of this fourth case may be elaborated with the following example.
称作悲剧的《罗密欧与朱丽叶》事实上并不符合亚理斯多德的悲剧理论，它更象是一部喜剧。
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet does not coincide with Aristotle's tragic theo- ries:it is more like a comedy.
由于亚理斯多德认为，无自制力者是该被责备的，因此，他从一开始便是在道德教养的脉络下讨论无自制力的问题。
Since Aristotle thinks that the akratic is blameworthy , the problem of akrasia belongs in fact to his discussion about moral education .
由于亚理斯多德认为，无自制力者是该被责备的，因此，他从一开始便是在道德教养的脉络下讨论无自制力的问题。
Since Aristotle thinks that the akratic is blameworthy , the problem of akrasia belongs in fact to his discussion about moral education .
应用推荐