令人难以置信的是，最近唯一的随机比较治疗临床试验来自2005年瑞典的研究。
Incredibly, the only recent randomized trial comparing treatments is a 2005 study from Sweden.
对小于37周早产儿将进行发展性照顾与该龄早产儿常规育婴室护理进行比较，并测定临床相关结局的随机试验。
Randomized trials in which elements of developmental care are compared to routine nursery care for infants < 37 weeks gestation and that measured clinically relevant outcomes.
我们收纳比较TIPS及腹水穿刺术搭配或不搭配容量扩张剂，用以治疗肝硬化病人并发难治性腹水的随机临床试验。
We included randomised clinical trials comparing TIPS and paracentesis with or without volume expanders for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites.
近年来，国外已完成了一系列有关的随机对照临床试验，比较客观的评估了急性心肌梗死补救性介入治疗的效果。
In recent years, a series of randomized controlled clinical trials on rescue angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction were completed.
我们设计了随机临床试验，比较研究对此类病人采用放疗加支持疗法与单独采用支持疗法的区别。
We conducted a randomized trial that compared radiotherapy and supportive care with supportive care alone in such patients.
方法采用前瞻性的随机临床试验的流行病学方法，从用药成本和效果进行分析比较。
Methods: the perspective method of epidemiology, which carries on clinical experiments at random, is adopted and comparisons are made from the perspective of the costs and effects of the drugs.
比较结果的依据指标主要是人工搜寻和电子搜寻找到的随机临床试验报告的数目。
The main outcome measure was the number of reports of randomized trials identified by handsearching as compared to electronic searching.
在本回顾探讨的各种不同比较当中﹐人工搜寻找到的随机临床试验报告占所有报告总数比例从92%到100%不等。
Handsearching identified between 92% to 100% of the total number of reports of randomized trials found in the various comparisons in this review.
本篇文献回顾提供了许多分析非处方人工泪液间直接比较的随机与半随机对照之临床试验需要的统合分析观点。
This review provides a much needed meta-analytical look at all randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials that have analyzed head-to-head comparisons of OTC artificial tears.
在第一孕期小于14周使用电动或手动真空抽吸实施的人工流产，以随机对照性的临床试验比较疼痛控制的方法。
Randomized controlled trials comparing methods of pain control in first trimester surgical abortion at less than 14 weeks gestational age using electric or manual suction aspiration.
没有发现比较脊髓损伤病人，行外科脊柱固定手术和其他治疗的随机对照临床试验或其他有对照组的临床试验。
No randomised controlled trials or controlled trials were identified that compared surgical spinal fixation surgery to other treatments in patients with a traumatic SCI.
没有发现比较脊髓损伤病人，行外科脊柱固定手术和其他治疗的随机对照临床试验或其他有对照组的临床试验。
This review found no controlled trials of spinal fixation surgery for the patient group. The quality of the existing evidence is too poor to include in the review, as it is likely to be unreliable.
没有发现比较脊髓损伤病人，行外科脊柱固定手术和其他治疗的随机对照临床试验或其他有对照组的临床试验。
This review found no controlled trials of spinal fixation surgery for the patient group. The quality of the existing evidence is too poor to include in the review, as it is likely to be unreliable.
应用推荐