Plus, this ratio ranks in the 73rd annual percentile, suggesting short-term options players are more pessimistically aligned than usual.
FORBES: Bullish Options Java Plays In Krispy Kreme, Starbucks and Dunkin'
Regardless of its technical prowess, however, options players remain pessimistically positioned toward CAKE.
FORBES: Go Ahead, Take A Big Bite Of Cheesecake Factory With Options
This reading is also near an annual high, indicating that traders have rarely been more pessimistically aligned toward the shares.
In other words, short-term options players have been more pessimistically positioned just one-fourth of the time during the past 12 months.
In other words, short-term options players have been more pessimistically aligned toward the shares only 7% of the time during the past year.
What this means is that options players have been more pessimistically aligned toward the shares only 20% of the time during the past 12 months.
That being said, there is some negative correlation evidence in the data that shows pessimistically low sentiment among market experts is often followed by higher stock prices.
It is caused by a political system pessimistically designed to curtail political action, one that depends of the triumph of an over-enthusiastically optimistic reading of human nature.
Plus, this ratio stands higher than 89% of all others taken during the past year, suggesting short-term speculators are more pessimistically positioned than usual at the moment.
This ratio registers in the 92nd percentile of its annual range, meaning near-term options players have been more pessimistically aligned toward the security just 8% of the time during the last 52 weeks.
This ratio is higher than 99% of all those taken during the past year, indicating that short-term options players have been more pessimistically aligned toward the shares only 1% of the time during the past 12 months.
Overall, I believe it is fair to say that the Stern Review consistently leans toward (and consistently phrases issues in terms of) assumptions and formulations that emphasize optimistically low expected costs of mitigation and pessimistically high expected damages from greenhouse warming relative to most other studies of the economics of climate change.
FORBES: Why Most Forbes Readers Know More About Global Warming than Most Climate Scientists
应用推荐