While the U.S. has had its own winemaking scandals (usually around the honesty of zinfandel blends), the country is more often the object of scammers, usually fly-by-night European exporters selling "rare" wines at low prices.
Does the President object to a country that has enough money basically using money to keep people from protesting in a country that has very little in the way of political rights, especially for women?
There also is an international legal doctrine that during the period when a country has signed but not yet ratified a treaty, it must take no measures that defeat the treaty's object and purposes.