结果：经1个疗程治疗后，治疗组总有效率81%，对照组总有效率40%，两组相比有显著性差异（P<0.01）。
Result:After one course of treatment, there were significant difference in the curative rate(81% vs 40%, P<0.01) between treatment group and control group.
两组总有效率比较，差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
The total effective ratio of two groups had significant difference(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率为93.4%，对照组总有效率为73.3%，两组总有效率比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
Results:The total effect rates in the therapeutic group and control group were 93.4% and 73.3% respectively which with a significant difference (P<0.05).
结果吉诺通治疗慢性鼻窦炎组有效率为96.4％，对照组有效率79.3％，两组比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
Results The effective rate was 96.4% for cases in TG and it was only 79.3% for those in CG, with a significant difference between them (P<0. 05).
结果：治疗组总有效率为88.24%，对照组总有效率65%，两组比较差异有显著性（P<0.05）。
Results: Total effective rate of treatment group and control group was 88.24% and 65%, respectively, with significant differences between groups(P<0.05).
结果：临床疗效：治疗组与对照组总有效率分别为94.29％、84.00％，两组疗效比较，有显著性差异（P＜0.05）。
Results:The total effective rates of primary dysmenorrhea disease in treatment and control group wre 94.29% and 84.00% respectively with obvious difference between them (P<0.05).
结果：治疗组有效率和KPS评分改善率均高于对照组，两组间差异有显著性（P<0.05）。
Results: The total effective rate and KPS improvement rate of combined therapeutic group are higher than that of control group, there is a significant difference between the two groups(p<0.05).
结果温针灸合电磁疗组有效率为93.4%，口服保列治组有效率为85.0%，两组比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.01）。
Results The effective rate was 93.4% in the warming acupuncture plus electromagnetotherapy group and 85.0% in the oral Proscar group. There was a significant difference between the two groups(P<0.01).
结果两组总有效率比较，差异有显著性。
Results There was a significant difference in the total effective rate.
结果：治疗组临床疗效总有效率为93.33％，而尼莫地平组为76.67％，两组比较差异有显著性意义（P＜0.05），治疗组疗效优于对照组。
Results The total effective rate for vasecular headache patients in the two groups were 93.33%, 76.67% (P<0. 05), but the treatment group was superior to the control group.
结果：经统计学分析，治疗组总有效率90.00%，对照组总有效率73.33%，两组比较总有效率有显著性差异(P 0.05)。
Results: the statistic analysis revealed that the total effective rate of the treatment group is 90.00%, while the control group is 73.33%. There was significant difference between them (P0.05).
结果 快速止痛法组总有效率为100%，对照组总有效率为83.3%。且两组治疗后血沉、血白细胞、血尿酸值等差异有显著性（P<0.01）。
Results The effective rate in the group A and group B were 100% and 83.3% respectively, with a very significant difference in ESR, WBC count and serum level of UA between the two groups(P<0.01).
结果临床治疗总有效率治疗组为93.33%，激素组为73.33%，两组比较差异有显著性（P<0.05）；
Results The total effective rate was 93.33% in the treatment group, significantly higher than that in the prednisone group which was 73.33%(P<0.05);
两组有效率比较差异有非常显著性（P＜0.01）。
The stastical difference was very obviously before treatment and after treatment. (P<0.01).
结果临床疗效治疗组总有效率89。8%，对照组总有效率66。1%，两组有显著性差异P。
Results the total effective rate of the treatment group was 89.8% and 66.1% of the control group.
结果：治疗4个月后两组比较，心绞痛、心电图的总有效率有显著性差异（P<0.01）；
Results:After 4 months' treatment, the total effective rate of angina pectoris and ECG had significant difference(P<0.01);
结果：临床结果表明两组间有效率及治愈日有显著性差异（P<0.05）。
Results: There was a significant difference between the final therapeutic evapuation in the 2 groups ( P<0.05).
结果：临床结果表明两组间有效率及治愈日有显著性差异（P<0.05）。
Results: There was a significant difference between the final therapeutic evapuation in the 2 groups ( P<0.05).
应用推荐